I know you are looking for a community where you can share your concerns, get support because you are a social being. This is a normal demand. In addition, you feed on classic descriptions, and learn how these communities have evolved in the past. This is also featured by Hollywood in a number of productions and you take those as a real reference. Then you go to find for yourself a team and you can't find. Within Muslims you will never find that. On the one hand, we are divided within ourselves, we are broken into many sects, but there are more important reasons as well. Could you realize what the consequence would be if a community teaches you that the conduct of the external world, its leadership, economic, legislative power over you is nonsense? And then I'm not even talking about the moral depravity of this external power! Can you imagine that such a community could operate? It's impossible.

Even I don't think that a community like that would be realistic. Rather, I choose to explain classic principles that are available here to everyone, and not only to a particular community. I do not impose these principles on anyone. Whoever likes it can follow, who doesn't, keep it for him/herself as information. I leave it to the free choice of the individuum. However, a physical (non-virtual) community operates in a herd-spirit. The individual gradually loses his or her own awareness and follows the flock-leader as a sheep. If the individual is rebellious, organizational rules and sanctions will come. An organization never works on the principle of free thinking. The basis for the operation of an organization is the renunciation from the individual sovereignty. We express it beautifully in this way, but in Hungarian it means creating a sheep herd. Do you understand than why a church cannot be established in Islam? That's why. The individual's freedom of thought, its direct relationship with God, cannot be influenced by man or by an intermediate person. This is not a ban on respect of scholars. It's just that they are scholars, ulemas who need to be listened to, but they are not mediators between man and God.

That's the theory. The reality is different. In reality, there are Islamic communities around the world that don't differ from the order of other churches or secular organizations. However, they can be different in one aspect: when they involve the fanaticism of ignorant masses and the firearm together with the unquestionable truth of the boss. If this is not possible in the particular culture, then classical teaching has to be shallowed. As a result, we are confronted with show elements, spectacle-Islam, which we have talked about repeatedly. God? No God! Man! Forget about that my beloved brothers in Allah! Today we have beloved brothers in man.

I do not believe in the legitimacy of big political communities who are in fashion and put Islam on their flag. I haven't lost my confidence in Islam, but in the man, who holds the flag in his hand. I am convinced that we live in an age where individual awareness, when it is well established, is more effective than principles which are followed by sheep-herds. It is because communities are pushing their boundaries, they are defining identities, but individual awareness can open in all directions. An individual may realize that his/her thinking may also meet a person of a different identity. This is the proof that God gave everyone the same values. The internet is an excellent mean for this. With the improvement of our Internet awareness in a positive sense, we can exchange more information about our principles and motivations than any community in history has ever been able to do so. Nobody can see whether I am writing here while wearing an underpants or jellabiya, which would open chance for people to offend me because the given community is much more attentive to these secondary issues than to the essence what I am going to say. I can write my own opinion so that people do not interrupt in the beginning of my sentence. I have an opinion. It is not the opinion of a sheep, but mine and I share it. Readers have opinion, too. If it is different and communicated with respect, I welcome it. However, a physical community doesn't work that way. There, the hierarchy decides the rank of an opinion. Here I can explain that the doctrines of the Qur'an are sacred and inviolable, but the Sunnah in its original and non-adapted form cannot be followed. I can argue that Sharia lives and will live, provided if it is harmonized with age and place. Obviously, it is inapplicable in its medieval form. I can argue that charity is beautiful, but today we live within moral standards where charity often can produce parasites who instead of expressing gratitude become claimants. I said that often and not always. And there are a thousand things that I can argue about and I do. But most important is to argue that you who are there and reading this article should not believe anything! Not even for me! It is not my purpose to make you accept what is described here, but to make you think.

Because, those have power over you to whom you give power. This also applies to those who provide you information. If you accept all fake news about ISIS for being simple Muslim fundamentalists, or give credit to stories about Iran's "terrorist organizations" without looking at the multinational games in their background, you will end up on a track that your logic will guide you far from realities. Those groups cannot be alone the scenario-composers of regional balance alone! When you don't have the money for a bus ticket to go from Buda to Pest, do you believe that some people by their own will can create a state with full armament secretly? If media succeeds to make you believe the Shi'iteSunni story as real, then with the same credibility, you should believe that the Franco-Italian relationship today is determined by the position of Julius Caesar and Vercingetorix, the Gallic leader. Sure, vehemently shouting people wearing turban can be seen on every side, but this is part of the playwright.

What does Quran write about the veil on the eyes?

Allah hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur). (Quran 2:7)

It is worth to note the sequence of statements! On the first place is the seal on their heart as the most important place of senses. On the second place is the hearing and only the third is the eye. This evaluation gives instruction how to comprehend the World and our society! First is the sight with heart (Basira). If our heart is blind the rest of senses will not be able to detect the stimuluses of the outside world properly. However, cataract, blindness first appears.