So, there is no objectivity according to human scale. Only subjective answer can be given. And its validity is also limited in space and time. Therefore, our debates and clashes seem insignificant and childish from outside. It's like kids waging war for a chocolate. After all, the battles of the past look meaningless, and the goals of those who defeat each other are often incomprehensible. Three hundred years from now, our strategically well-defined definitions will seem infantile. And we grab each other's throats. There should be a parent who to slap us in face. However, there is a parent, believe me. He exists even if you can't see Him.

I have been got on against human domination so far and will continue to do so. Especially when it is not mind-based dominance, but humiliating, contemptuous supremacy. In Africa, these are very striking.

When a nation conquers the territory of another nation, they subjugate them and the first thing they do is to change the name of the country and call the inhabitants in the language of the subjugators. What is their goal with this? It makes you feel that you do not have a country and have no past to be proud of. "I'll even erase the past what you have got from your mother!" From today you will be called Morrison, or Springwater, or worse, to call a black man White. They ridicule and distort the world where natives were born into, so it becomes a shame to remember what the elders call a glorious past around the campfire. You have a mass of degrading, humiliating or meaningless names, but those who give them have names with deep meaning and their history is introduced into our consciousness as the universal history of human civilization. This is called reprogramming. Such name changes and "voluntary" name changes are known in Europe and even in Hungary. Don't you look conspicuous the names of some Jewish families? Is it at all reasonable that the followers of Moses are called Grün, Schwartz, or even the Rosenthal? These have become common and acceptable names today, but at the time they were born those were part of the humiliation.

Then comes the reprogramming of faith, the missions. Jesus, the blond, blue-eyed ubermensch, and Mohammed the saint speaking only in Arabic language! But Jesus was not so, and the miracle of Mohammed (peace be upon them) was in his everyday simplicity. They were able to communicate with us, humans. They did not throw down wisecracks from the heavens, but spoke to beggars, the fallen, to the great average directly, sitting under a tree wearing ordinary clothes. Now their turbocharged versions and their fairytale worlds are published and are washing the brains.

Muhammad is no more than an apostle: many Were the apostle that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then Turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah. but Allah (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve Him) with gratitude. (Quran 3:144)

This verse primarily applies to the battle of Uhud, in the course of which a cry was raised that the Messenger was slain. He had indeed been severely wounded, but Talha, Abu Bakr, and Ali were at his side, and his own unexampled bravery saved the Muslim army from a rout. This verse was recalled again by Abu Bakr when the Messenger actually died a natural death eight years later, to remind people that Allah, Whose Message he brought, lives forever.

O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an apostle of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His apostles. Say not "Trinity" : desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah. Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs. (Quran 4:171)

In religion people's excesses may lead them to blasphemy or a spirit the very opposite of religion. The Jewish excesses in the direction of formalism, racialism, exclusiveness, and rejection of Christ Jesus have been denounced in many places. Here the Christian attitude is condemned, which raises Jesus to an equality with Allah: in some cases venerates Mary almost to idolatry: attributes a physical son to Allah: and invents the doctrine of the Trinity, opposed to all reason, which according to the Athanasian Creed, unless a man believes, he is doomed to hell for ever. Let our Muslims also beware lest they fall into excesses either in doctrine or in formalism. The actual problem of the Islamic Umma comes from this point. Islam is the most tolerant and most recipient religion while some of our Muslims are the most intolerant and most segregating.

Is this the way how we want to live next to each other in the long run, while everyone brings their own dominance or humiliation into a common future? Are foreign hands and perceptions digging in my past, my traditions, turning it into a musical-dancing party because it can be sold and consumed better?

We are still far from looking at people from a distance or proximity like God. As long as we see skin colors, national tricolors, instead of seeing single souls, we shall have problem with our self-esteem and evaluation of our companions. There is no other space in which Heaven and Hell exist. There is only one space. That's what we live in. We change it into Heaven or Hell. Now I am not dealing with the Afterlife dimensions, which is completely different. We cannot know it and cannot make statements about it, only the facts what Allah tells us. I deal with earthly existence and the earthly Hell that man's infantile consciousness brings to proximity.

Perhaps, living in the future and looking back at our quarrels today, a group of scientists will spend years exploring the causes of our confrontations and the motives. Unless we kill each other or make the planet uninhabitable. For my part, I do not understand the motives even today.