However, there is nothing to do with the origin of ruling family in Saudi Arabia. Their acts are more important.

As we mentioned earlier, in 1744 King Mohammed Al-Saud established a treaty with Sheik Mohammed bin Abdel Wahab. According to this deal the House of Al-Saud gives the Kings and House Al-Wahab provides ideology. This ideology went back to the basement of Islam and didn’t tolerate any view or thought out of their own teachings. Any alteration they considered it falsification or renewal (Bida’a) what is prohibited. So, all other Islamic sects were Bida’a and were regarded as enemies. Formal imagery, paintings were forbidden and as a result the zealous groups of wahabis from 1805 when they entered Medina started to destroy the tombs of the successors of the Prophet (peace be upon him). This way the tomb of Fatma, daughter of Mohammed (peace be upon him) became dust, too in the cemetery of Djannat ul-Baqi. The reason: nobody should go to the tombs to remember because it is idolatry (shirk). Wahabis destroyed most of the Islamic heritage and in 1925 they wanted to demolish the resting place of Mohammed (peace be upon him) in Medina. In the beginning of the 20th century they wanted to destroy even the Kaaba but finally the international protest could prevent them.

So, in 1744, after about one thousand year from the mission of the Prophet (peace be upon him) an Islamic sect was established what considered other Islamic sects as enemies. They declare wars, are hostile, violent and destroy heritage. Why do we consider them Islamic?

I’ve mentioned that Saudi Arabia is not unified. House of Al-Saud is not unified as well. its members count 15000 and among them about 2000 are close to the wealth and power. However even this 2000 are divided so we have to make sure when we declare anything that whom we are speaking about? E.g. Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al-Saud who is the father of the very rich Prince Waleed. He was called “Red Prince” and arrest order was issued against him due to the critics what he made against the ruling family. Out of him numerous other members of the House turned against the rulers. Some of them disappeared and some emigrated.

The best what we can do if we link an act or statement to the actual person, ruler and the name. The statement for example that Saudi Arabia is following wahabi doctrines is not true. It is true only for the House of Al-Saud and their followers. If we say that Saudi Arabia wage war with Yemen is also not true! King Salman and Crown prince Mohammed bin Salman wage war with Yemen actually. The Kingdom is their property and the responsibility fall always on the owner of the property whatever happens.

Let's see what the hadith writes.

Book of Fitna (temptation, intrigue, perturbation) Bukhary 1037 and Muslim 2905:

"O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet said, "There will appear earthquakes and Fitna (afflictions), and from there will come out the Age (Horn) of Satan."

It is obvious that the events of today in the Middle East, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Palestine which are financed by Saud Arabia and its vassal states are part of a big plan. The goal of this study is not to write about conspiracy theories but to give clear picture about the prosperity, rampage and fall of the Al Saud dynasty. For Zionist powers it is fatal if an axis will be established between Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon but this line is getting stronger day by day. Al Saud makes nervous steps. With attacking Yemen they expected a quick victory after they were defeated in other battlefields. No matter the tribal life in Yemen and their traditional system, their brain is hundred year advanced before the Saudi royal family. Yemenis didn’t tolerate their puppet state status financed by Al Saud and they have revolted. Concerning territorial strategy Yemen is very important country. The Strait of Bab el Mandeb cannot be by passed in the Red See where oil tankers are passing towards the Suez Channel. Anyone who keeps that region in hand can control a big strategic value. Nothing of the Saudi blames can be justified.

1. In Yemen Shiite minority is going to take over the control which is supported by Iran. That is humbug. Iran hasn’t interfered the events militarily. They shipped humanitarian supply and weapons but they haven’t deployed troops. Iran hasn’t given support on the base of Shiite affiliation but they support groups who are going to get rid of tyranny and are going to put an end to the chaos caused by Al-Qaeda and are going to set up their self-determination by their own without any foreign intervention.
2. Second Saudi charge: The action of Yemenis is dangerous to the Arabic existence and affiliation. It is humbug. Yemen has the only cultural heritage in the Arabic peninsula where even thousands of years ago civilizations were flourishing. This place was the womb of the Arabic language and culture. The Hymiar dynasty thousands of years ago established a system of dams where the water of Iram river and springs of the hills were collected creating aquaculture. This aquaculture and trade and caravan routes opened the way for people to change their ideas and thoughts between each other. After the fall of dam of Maareb all that prosperity was destroyed and the tribes of Hymiar were forced to wander. Their diaspora served as genetic basement for Arabic nations. This diaspora was the root of tribes in Saud Arabia, Syria, Iraq, etc. Yemen in its own represents the Arabic existence and affiliation so it cannot threaten Arabs. Who threatens Arabs is the Al Saud dynasty who are originally not Arab.
3. Third charge: Yemen threatens Islam, the Holy Stone of Kaaba, Medina and the grave of Prophet (PBUH). This is humbug too. The largest Islamic country is Indonesia. If there were no Muslim merchants from Yemen in the Medieval this huge country was not acquainted with Islam. However, who really threaten the Kaaba, Medina and the grave of our Prophet are the Vahabis who wanted to destroy all of these in 1936.
4. Charge number four: The Al-Houthi who are the leading power of the revolt are Shiites and they generate conflict between Islamic sects. It is humbug. Al-Houthi really are the leading power of the revolt but not only Shiites joined them. This is a struggle of a nation who woke up. But Al Saud is the only side who is interested in creating a Shiite-Sunni conflict. At least in 3 the last seventy years they invested all what they could in order to realize it. The existence of Islamic State and the intelligence activities of Al Saud in Syria, Iraq are proving that all.
5. This is not a charge but a statement of Al Saud: The airstrikes are targeting exclusively the basements, logistics and stands of rebels. It is humbug too. Hospitals, water works, civilian infrastructures, public services and everything what served the basic supply of the Yemeni nation was targeted.

So, if that all blames and their disproof are not enough there are Israeli jets supporting Saudi airstrikes and the invasion gained the legitimacy of US. Now it is clear who is standing at which side. However, the expected easy victory hasn’t come and the coalition of Arab states has fallen too. After the initial hot slogans, they left the war operation one by one. Al Saud is getting amortized and their deeds are hardly tolerated by their allies. The democracies of 21th century cannot support its anachronistic system and its aggressive politics. Its Zionist attitude reducing its importance among Arabic-Islamic states. The Al Saud dynasty remains a permanent payment provider for the American and Israeli bills of the region but they cannot support a looser. How long this dynasty can stand? They struggle. They are pushing vehemently the modernization on the country instead of realizing it step by step. Bars are opening, nightclubs are pouring the Western fashion, which all does not mean anything, but in a country where music was banned, women could not drive vehicles, the life of people was under strong control, nobody knows what this sudden opening will result.
Whatever the end of the game, Saudi Arabia is an ally of the U.S. involved in proxy wars. And if this is the case, the many terrorist organizations maintained with Saudi money and other organizations that are questionable in their function, which also operate with Saudi finance in the world, are not serving Saudi needs. While the sense of horror is there in the U.S. public communication when they comment the events with innocent eyes, as if they don't understand why bloodsheds can happen, however those are all take place in the interests of the U.S. and Israel. The kingdom is a means of creating chaos, power relations and imbalances.

Mohammed bin Szalman (1985-)