h i r d e t é s

The way is not to forbid and allow, but teaching

Olvasási idő
4perc
Eddig olvastam
a- a+

The way is not to forbid and allow, but teaching

2020. február 11. - 14:58

With teaching a level can be reached where people make choose their ways consciously and not by pushing them in particular directions by laws. If this is the right way, then reverse the logic.

@Mihálffy Balázs

If teachings are withheld and are replaced only by prohibitions and allowances, then conscious morality, aesthetics, personal judgment are extinguished, and remains merely the animal fate. Ergo, we are treated like an animal. The reins are being pulled, nothing more. But once the snaffle breaks our mouth!

Let's review what are the means by which we are pushed into directions. Because we hear these terms all the time that the state based on law, rule of the law, and so on. Until then, it was clear that man was a creature among many who lived in nature. He got free will and awareness, which he did not always used at best way. True, he created civilizations, cultures, but he spent most of his energy on taking advantage out of others and the outside world. He separated from the harmonious order of nature, which we call Islam, and created his own orders. Men locked themselves into micro communities, built towns and settlements that served their comfort and safety. As he moved away from the Universal Order, his own set of rules became more distorted. He committed the crime first and later forbade it in order to prevent others from doing the same on his expense. He first exterminated peoples, robbed them, then qualified his actions and prevented a new power from doing the same. The same is applied at individual level. He did formulate norms based on such logic regarding his attitude not only towards his fellow human beings, but also in his relationship with the outside world and nature. He also looted it first, and then, when the oxygen level was low and waters became polluted, began to think and ordered regulations. Or, he would regulate it if his greed would have not prevented it. A superpower can still do what it wants, the little ones do what they want. They have to take care of the environment while the big ones don’t care about it.

In practice, the law-related part of human evolution is a process of alienation from the Universal Order, the Islam. Then, how Islam won't disturb many! Don't even expect Islam to be liked! However, correct analysis requires me to use self-criticism as well. We Muslims have moved away from this Universal Order as much as our fellow human beings did. However, our alienation goes towards infantilism, interests for power, and faith-betrayal which has happened and is happening even today. Back to the basic idea. If we create an increasingly artificial microenvironment, which is getting farther from the Universal Order, it can only be regulated by increasingly unnatural laws. Just as one's consciousness works toward dominance, even the law protects that dominance, but it protects only the dominance of those who make the law. The rest are struggling to survive in their abandoned state.

Not only the distance between nature-man and man-man is growing, but the segment is also narrowing how laws cover a subject. Because, the more they specify, elaborate, explain, the more they narrow their scope. Example: Chapter VII of the Hungarian Constitution Article 1, paragraph 1, "Everyone has the right to peaceful assembly." From this point will be elaborated the concept, what we call a peaceful assembly. With every word we apply to define the concept, we reduce the scope of peaceful assembly. Like the mother who says to her baby son before childbirth, "if little Joe is born, we shall love you the same way Charles". Until then, it had not come into the mind of Charles that he would not be loved after the birth of Joe, but after hearing that he thinks: fuck it! There will be trouble here! I'm going to pee in Joe's milk so he won't take my mother from me! Well, statutory regulation also narrows its scope in the rate of entering in details. And if we turn on the operation of our parliaments to illuminate a legislative process, we can think: moving away from the Universal Order to enforce an unnatural, artificial microcosm, stabilizing an aberrated human domination, ever-narrowing scopes covered by regulation, and all of this is the product of a cretin, ever-changing, impressionable gang. No wonder then, that the natural sense of justice encoded in humans (which is just a sense!), is not satisfied. In practice, the laws barely cover the cases. If they do it, even some variety of interpretations occur. This is what lawyers use. So, if there is a case, then the case is forced onto an existing law, whether it fits or not, because there is not always a matching regulation. So, it's the other way around here, too. Human writing is the base and the matter has to be forced on it! If it is already impossible, it will take a tremendous amount of work to change the rule. And the new rule will become more complex, thereby narrowing the scope of the subject what it covers. Here you are the impossibility of an artificial human society based on prohibitions and allowances, which can only work if consciousness is wiped out. For it is ridiculous, miserable if consciousness exists.

It is not the regulation that needs to be propagated, but the teaching. Not a piece of paper should be valid in order to know what is allowed or not, but our own consciousness, heart, inner conviction. We should not be lost in conflicting laws which confront each other, but to follow the path of our conscience. It is difficult to fit into the paranoid order of an artificial world, but easy to fit into the Universal Order, which no one can escape in the long run. And as long as you preach about that, no existing power will ever accept you. It is essential that this way of thinking should not become popular. Look what's going on in China? One and a half billion giant who is not afraid of the US, Russia, fears the teachings of a couple million Uyghur. China fears Mesut Ozil, a German-Turkish footballer and practicing Muslim, who posted a statement on his social media accounts, calling Uighurs "fighters who resist persecution". He also accused China of burning Qurans, closing mosques and the killings of religious scholars. https://www.euronews.com/2019/12/16/arsenalfootballer-mesut-ozil-misled-over-uighurs-says-china

Look what's going on in India? Law has been passed to allow devotees of religions practiced in India to migrate from neighboring countries and obtain citizenship in India. Only Muslims are exceptions to this. They cannot settle down and acquire citizenship. Ethnic proportions will change with this law. But these are the regions where there are visible signs of disapproval. Even in our sly "civilized" world, there are signs of rejection. Sarcasm, negative role-playing, enemy image portraying, magnifying the bad, silencing the good, etc. Meanwhile, we are on a step-by-step journey towards an increasingly artificial, inanimate world. Time will come when the laws protecting this world will fall down from the object of protection and be destroyed. Or don't you know about the destruction of the deceptions practiced by the magicians who competed with Moses?

"Throw that which is in thy right hand: Quickly will it swallow up that which they have faked what they have faked is but a magician's trick: and the magician thrives not, (no matter) where he goes." (Quran 20:69)

That falsehood and trickery may have their day, but they cannot win everywhere, especially in the presence of Truth, or - that trickery and magic must come to an evil end.

So the magicians were thrown down to prostration: they said, "We believe in the Lord of Aaron and Moses". (Quran 20:70)